In my first post about the perpetual value method, I mentioned that it was actually a spinoff of another budding concept I was working on. After reading up on the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, I
-
-
For being a finance nerd, I’m a bit embarrassed to admit that savings has always been a confusing subject for me. In my mind, there are three financial buckets that I can understand putting my
-
My previous post proposed a crazy idea that what we should be doing to help new investors is giving them $50,000 to start off with. Even though this is a long shot, how could a system be put into
-
If my Perpetual Value Theory hasn’t been debunked yet, then I would like to venture into even more ambitious waters. This concept that I’ve been working on has been to find alternative
-
I’ve been using a model that assumes static wages over 30 years, and while that is unrealistic, it is useful to observe the how one’s financial status changes due to the investing strategy and
-
I stated previously that while this perpetual value method is a highly effective investing concept, it isn’t the most efficient, that’s because you have to remove some of the investment and then
-
Today I will be presenting additional new insights on investing while further explaining this concept of perpetual value towards funding. This will be focused on the inner workings of resources and